Seems odd that someone other then myself could enter into an agreement for services, not pay for those services and then hold me accountable for the costs. I could understand liability in the case of the minor themselves incurring a debt. In this case however, I was not a party to or aware of any agreement, consent or approval for the services rendered. I am not even aware of what the services were (i.e. elective or necessary). Taken to its logical extreme, this would imply that a divorced parent could theoretically have a multi-thousand dollar elective medical service performed on a minor child, agree to these without the other parents consent or knowledge, and then not pay for them and have the other parent stuck with the bill. Does not sound terribly equitable.

