
Quoting
seniorjudge
...
Q: So are you saying you don't think my situation applies to the double deposit provision?
A: No, I do not. "...A landlord shall not be entitled to retain any portion of a security deposit for damages claimed unless he has first obtained a money judgment for the disputed amount or filed with the court satisfactory proof of an inability to obtain service on the tenant or unless:...(d) The amount claimed is entirely based upon accrued and unpaid rent equal to the actual rent for any full rental period or portion thereof during which the tenant has had actual or constructive possession of the premises...."
But, of course, it doesn't make the slightest difference what I think!....