JK, thanks for the thoughts. To answer, I must name the bank so that rulings in court are directed to the bank. Or, alternatively, the bank accepted the Partnership Agreement but then, when informed of the change in MP, did not follow the direction of the MP. Also, they acted on a verbal objection and asked that the Partnership collectively present a court order. They did not inform the one partner that verbally objected that she needed a court order.
To address the business interests: Yes, I understand. I am not suing the bank, I am suing all interested parties so that when the suit is decided in my favor, they all must answer to the court. I ask that the court rule that 1/3 is mine, that the former and current MP have abrogated their fiduciary duty and they must direct the bank to disgorge those funds to me. Damages by the two MP are another matter.

