Quote Quoting Disagreeable
View Post
I get really torqued when people intentionally provide pictures that misrepresent road markers. You ignored the left turn arrow for your lane back by JoAnn fabrics AND you intentionally did not show a close up of the double left turn sign between the traffic lights.

https://maps.google.com/maps?client=...ed=0CAgQ_AUoAg
If you read the description, you would know that the roads were recently paved. There was no left turn arrow for my lane back by JoAnn fabrics.

I didn't show a close up on the double left turn sign? What do you expect? I mentioned it in my description and you can see it in Figure 3.

Way to be helpful...

- - - Updated - - -

Quote Quoting That Guy
View Post
What do you mean "double left hand turn"?

That should answer all your questions but I'll provide you with more reasoning as to why one if not both your violations were valid.

While you were stopped at the light, look up at the white sign with black arrows and letters and tell me what you see?

You see TWO mandatory turn arrows. Meaning the two left most lanes are dedicated left turn arrows i.e. this intersection is as you described it, is a "double left-hand turn intersection"... And since you were in the second lane from the left, that placed you in a mandatory left turn lane. And yet you went straight.
I understand that the sign was there and what the sign mean. When I was at the intersection, I did not pay attention to left turn arrows or signage, because at the time, I was under the impression that it was perfectly legal to go straight.

The point I'm trying to make is that I was not properly informed of the turn lanes due to a lack of lane markings.