So we should just throw the 1968 landmark case of California VS Cohen out the window along with our civil rights?? also the reason we have been harassed for 8 years by the police is because we are gay, if that makes us assholes that's your opinion! Now if any one has "real" legal knowledge instead of opinions, that would be great.
http://blog.oregonlive.com/clackamas...es_free_s.html kind of looks like I do...But thx![]()
That's not what you said upthread.also the reason we have been harassed for 8 years by the police is because we are gay
Your sexuality is irrelevant to your using profanity for the sake of using profanity in a publicly viewable place. You doubtless violated some local ordinance, and now there are consequences. If you threw around half the attitude at the cops that you've thrown around here, it's no wonder you have problems. "Testing free speech", my plush and luscious ass.
Hit the Yellow Pages, kid, and pay someone to hold your hand and "tut tut, those heartless bastards" at you. I'm sure you'll find someone happy to take your money in exchange for telling you what you want to hear.
Did he also attend law school and pass the bar? You might be surprised at some of the crazy notions laypersons get from reading case law.
You have a 14th Amendment right to use profanity in public? That would be... one of those crazy notions I just mentioned.Quoting azsexe1
What was he yelling? Something like, "My kids can see that sign"?Quoting azsexe1
They arrested you, as in they handcuffed you, took you to the police station, had you post bail, etc., or they simply issued a citation? What is the exact statute you are charged with violating? Arizona Statutes, Sec. 13-2904(3) ("A person commits disorderly conduct if, with intent to disturb the peace or quiet of a neighborhood, family or person, or with knowledge of doing so, such person:... 3. Uses abusive or offensive language or gestures to any person present in a manner likely to provoke immediate physical retaliation by such person....")? That provision attempts to codify fighting words doctrine. See Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942). I question whether the sign would rise to the level of conduct necessary to avoid a reversal on appeal, should you be convicted, as to support a conviction the fighting words must create an actual threat of immediate violence, not merely present offensive content.Quoting azsexe1
Note that, depending upon how much of a disturbance occurred after your neighbor confronted you, other provisions of ARS 13-2904 might apply to that confrontation.
Nobody "needs" to swear in public.
California vs. Cohen treated the epithet as falling outside of Chaplinsky's fighting words doctrine because no reasonable person could have believed that the expression was a direct personal insult. Would the police have been wrong if they inferred that your sign was specifically directed at your neighbor's household?
There is a time and place for everything.
There is a polite and considerate way to do things....and rude and impolite ways.
Did you ever think of POLITELY speaking to your neighbor about not cutting your tree? That if it's hanging on the neighbors property, you would prune it yourself? Did you think of politely asking your neighbor to stay off your roof?