My question involves criminal law for the state of: California

I worked for a NP Corporation, and was was convicted of embezzlement and filing false tax returns back in 2007. I was ordered to 5 years probation and restitution to the victim and the Franchise Tax Board. I originallly was ordered to pay 750/month, but went back to court to get it reduced when the FTB garnished my wages. The judge ordered the amount to 350 to be paid to the victim only. I successfully completed probation, never missed a payment. This past year I paid off the FTB and the garnishment was stopped. Since probation was also done, I starting paying 100 a month to Court Compliance.

Several months ago Court compliance called and said that I needed to be paying the 750 or 350 per month. I asked what jurisdiction they held over the payment as the probation was done, and also asked at the time who they were paying the restitution to. The Corporation was dissolved in 2008 and I wondered where my money was going. They let me know that they were paying Cal Mortgage, as the facility where I worked sent the payments back and directed them to pay them. I do not believe that Cal Mortgage is a direct victim. They were responsible for insuring the funds to get the facility built back in 1993 and 1991. The facility was eventually sold, the Corporation I worked for dissolved, and the insurance bonds were partially paid and written off (after my conviction).

Court compliance called me again recently and wanted me to get back on calendar and get the amount owed reduced since the FTB portion is paid off. I believe I have an argument to get the entire amount set aside, since they are not paying a direct victim and there is no direct victim now. I also believe that Court compliance is negligent for this as they just started mailing the payments (6 years worth) to Cal Mortgage without ever checking into the direct victim aspect.

Any thoughts? Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!