I am not interested in my own civil damages towards Wal-Mart, because I understand that they did have enough evidence to arrest.
I just thought that it was completely unprofessional the way I was treated.
The prosecutor actually advised Wal-Mart to drop the shoplifting charge two times, but they refused. Eventually, the office refused the case on lack of evidence and the charges were dropped. I just need advice on how to handle the fact that even though criminal charges were dropped, they now want civil damages.

