My question involves small claims court in the state of: IN

Attorney for "Plaintiff" appears in court, states he represents XYZ Company. this is proven to be untrue by the Defendant. on the next appearance in court, the Attorney for the "Plaintiff" states he made an 'honest mistake' and that he represents ABC Company. after contacting ABC Company, the Defendant is provided a written statement from the ABC Company President that they know nothing of this case, that they have no judgements against the Defendant and if they did, they do not want to pursue it or collect it. he even recommends that to him that this sounds like a scam and that the Defendant should contact an Attorney.

therefore since the Attorney for the "Plaintiff" has been proven to have lied under oath the first time and very possibly the second time, with the written statement from the aledged Plaintiff stating that they do NOT want to pursue or collect this judgement, should this be enough to get the judgement dismissed? if the Defendant has proven TWICE that the "Plaintiff" that the Attorney states he represents is either not the Plantiff or is not interested in pursuing this judgement, would that in fact mean there IS no Plaintiff and if there is no Plaintiff, there is no reason to continue any attempts to collect?