My question is regarding Driver's Edge, in the State of Oregon -

I purchased a vehicle last September (2009), and I also purchased an extended warranty through Driver's Edge.

Last week, the Transmission went out in the vehicle I had purchased, and I had the vehicle inspected at the local Transmission Shop. They said it would cost about $800 to repair. Driver's Edge went out and took a look and said yes, the damage is present and it will cost $800, however, we are not going to cover your vehicle because your tires at 9% over what the general specifications are for this vehicle.

So I called Dodge in Michigan, and had them fax the Building Specifications of MY car over to Driver's Edge to show that the tires that are currently on the vehicle, are the ones that it left the factory in 2001 with.

They are still denying the claim, saying it is not what the General Specifications are, and therefore we have been denied. The car company should have never sold the vehicle with those tires.

So my question is who is in fault in all of this? The car company was confronted with the issue, and they said they had no idea this clause was in the Warranty Contract.

Who is in fault in this mess? How about, who can be sued for this?

If you could give me your opinion, that would be great.

Thanks!