My question involves court procedures for the states of: Iowa or Illinois or New York, and the Untied States.
Hello, I would like to file a petition for injuctive relief in state court directed a my employer (who is a member of the Dow), but some of the parties that may want to participate on the issues are Federal agencies like the Department of Labor, Department of Justice, and Social Security, etc. Can I add them as parties even though they don't have a direct stake in the matter, but do have a stake in the outcome of the case as a matter of public policy, and if they can be added rather then waiting for them to interlop, does it have to be filed in Federal court?
Basically I want to file the petition as an inter-pleader and then let my employer, it's multiple insurance providers, and the government agencies duke out who is responsible and what the proper course of action should have been and what to do about it now that multiple state and Federal statutes have been violated (some deliberately).
Apparently I've found a crack in the system, because I filed a complaint of discrimination under tittle IV of the ADA against my employer and the contract I have with them is worded in such a way that allows them to put me on unpaid leave in perpetuity. Because I certified under penalty of perjury that I was able to work in support of the claim of discrimination I am not legally capable of filling for long term disability benefits through my employers insurance provider without committing both perjury and insurance fraud. The doctors would have to resubmit conflicting medical reports which could be use to crucify my claim with the EEOC and the insurance provider also. Due to further contractual agreements they have valid claim to any intellectual property I create or assist in creating and I am prohibited from working for other employers during this time as well; because they have not terminated our employment relationship (the contract), filing for unemployment would be effectively quitting and breach of contract due to the requirement to be available for work and able to work. At a minimum I would loose my insurance, but they could also deny my unemployment claim entirely too. Additionally if my employer is right to deny my accommodation (unlikely), It would implicitly imply that I'm not suitable for work elsewhere because a) they're the preeminent employer in my field and b) obligated to follow affirmative action practices because they are Federal contractor. I could find new employment in my field if I moved (nothing else is within commuting distance), but then I would be in breach of contract and discard unique rights and interests that are incalculable because of the size, scope, and preeminence that the organization has within my profession. I was planning to stay with them till retirement because I had unlimited upward potential. I forgot to add that lack of medical treatment for my condition would cause irreparable damage, and given that I have out of pocket costs and copay's I have no means to access services. Additionally, this is an abridged version of the main events and issues that relate to me, their are other ancillary issues in play. One more thing, I was receiving SSDI prior to my employment.
So at this point I'm about to loose my house, don't have car insurance for legal transportation, don't qualify for unemployment, don't qualify for disability, and am prohibited from working elsewhere unless I dispose of unique rights and interests to which money damages would be incalculable. I want to petition the court to award maintenance under the laws of equity, then motion for a TRO and/or temporary injunction restoring income, and then step aside and let all the other parties debate the issues. I'm probably entitled to some type of tort claim in all of this, but I don't know what that would be.

