My question involves bankruptcy in the state of: Washington
We have a unique situation with our Chapter 7 where the very people who caused our bankruptcy are now pursuing a 2004 exam and adversarial claims (what they filed was a blanket adversarial claim without any substance; just a placeholder so they don't lose their opportunity since the window has passed).
Sadly, the Court won't consider their harmful behavior and is treating them like any other creditor.
The issue is they are asking for bank records and statements from six years ago; their goal is to pick through every single transaction we've made in order to find any issues they can (ultimately their goal is to make the process miserable for us, since there is no other legitimate purpose). Of course we don't have these records and they would have to come from bank accounts long closed.
There are no major assets or justification for these requests; it's all "proof of income" (and we're talking less than $100,000 a year).
I've done some research on the 2004 exam and it seems there really is no limitation on the scope; which simply doesn't make sense to me. For example, what do my spending habits or income from 2007 have to do with obtaining discharge now? Absolutely nothing. Yet they're pushing for it with the justification of "we don't know where that money went"; and of course the amount is a middle classed income which would sustain a family - car, food, shelter, etc. Yet they want us to prove where every penny went since 2006 (when we filed in June of 2012). I don't see how this is reasonable, even under a 2004 exam.
I was under the impression a 2-year window was standard (from the time of filing) for providing documentation and materials. Is there any way to have a 2-year window "enforced" through a 2004 exam in order to limit the extent of records they demand?

