Results 1 to 9 of 9

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Re: Does a Presumption of Intent to Immigrate, INA 214(B), Violate Human Rights

    Mr. Knowitall Sir,

    With all due respects and regards!

    I truly appreciate your “NO” to the “Presumption”…..and add…..

    1. When Club’s in India displayed “Dogs and Indians not allowed” it was presumed a dog and an Indian were not fit to join the club. There was no Human Rights violation.
    2. When M.K.Gandhi was presumed to be a colored man not fit to travel in the First class compartment train at Pietermaritzburg. There was no Human Rights violation.
    3. When Rosa Parks was asked by the bus driver to vacate her seat for the whites. There was no Human Rights violation.

    The violation became effective when:-
    1. One had to prove you were not a dog or an Indian to be allowed into the club.
    2. Or Gandhi was thrown out from the first class compartment.
    3. Or when Rosa Parks got arrested for her refusal to vacate the seat for a white man.

    My question was and still is:-
    “Does 214 (b) violates Human Rights with no provisions of appeal in the US?”
    A. Till the moment I did not get the 214 b booklet I did not even know if any such law existed, for an applicant to satisfy the presumed assumption, that I was open to be called a liar, if I was an intending immigrant; when I had specifically applied on the DS-160 for a B1-B2 nonimmigrant Visa . There was no Human Rights violation. (true)
    B. The moment I am refused the visa and given the 214 b duly certified by a US embassy official, it violated my human right by certifying that I had lied, for I had immigrant intent on a non immigrant visa. A confirmation for me to seek and ask:-
    “Does 214 (b) violates Human Rights with no provisions of appeal in the US?”
    Thank you, for being kind enough to have replied. I have no wish to defame any one, will accept being called a liar too; But think, how many people go to the US embassies and get to be called liars and don’t even know about it!

    Lol.

    Truly yours,
    -Jai

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Somewhere near Canada
    Posts
    35,894

    Default Re: Does a Presumption of Intent to Immigrate, INA 214(B), Violate Human Rights

    You seem to be thinking that "Human Rights" is some sort of universal law.

    Is that correct?

  3. #3

    Default Re: Does a Presumption of Intent to Immigrate, INA 214(B), Violate Human Rights

    For you Mr. Dogmatique Sir,

    Hahahahaahahahahhaha! TRUE.

    A quote for you:-

    "In the United States Senate, one of the things I observed in the early days - and it's still used - and that is that you take someone's argument and then you misrepresent it and misstate and disagree with it. And it's very effective. I've done it myself a number of times. But eventually, eventually people catch on." -Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, speaking at the National Press Club in Washington.

    And for you Mr. Knowitall Sir,

    "Problems cannot be solved at the same level of awareness that created them."

    -- Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955)

    Lol Does one need a lawyer for moral obligation, due from a great country like the United States of America on HUMAN RIGHTS?

    With all due respects to every one.

    -Jai

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Somewhere near Canada
    Posts
    35,894

    Default Re: Does a Presumption of Intent to Immigrate, INA 214(B), Violate Human Rights

    Quote Quoting jai kumar garg
    View Post
    Hahahahaahahahahhaha! TRUE.

    A quote for you:-

    "In the United States Senate, one of the things I observed in the early days - and it's still used - and that is that you take someone's argument and then you misrepresent it and misstate and disagree with it. And it's very effective. I've done it myself a number of times. But eventually, eventually people catch on." -Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, speaking at the National Press Club in Washington


    And you're posting because...?

    Go troll elsewhere. Thanks.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Does a Presumption of Intent to Immigrate, INA 214(B), Violate Human Rights

    Sorry, If I have said something that hurts you. I will delete the entire posts I have made if you want me to do that!

    However, will refrain from posting here in the future.
    Thanks.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Behind a Desk
    Posts
    98,846

    Default Re: Does a Presumption of Intent to Immigrate, INA 214(B), Violate Human Rights

    You are free to retain the world's best lawyer, spend every penny you can raise, and litigate the issue to the Supreme Court. The answer you get will still be "no".

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Human Rights Violations Through Criminal Prosecution
    By Wronglyaccusedbutfree in forum International Law
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-20-2009, 07:07 AM
  2. Workmans Comp and Human Rights
    By surgicaltech in forum Worker's Compensation
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-05-2008, 07:13 AM
  3. Violation of Section 296 of the Human Rights Law
    By mopargirll in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-23-2008, 06:50 AM
  4. Extension On Deadline At The Human Rights Department
    By Ezra in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-07-2008, 03:04 PM
  5. Human rights in Australia
    By speng in forum Debate the Issues
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-05-2006, 05:12 PM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources