My question involves landlord-tenant law in the State of: California
My agreement to rent specifically states, under the section of "Premises", that the tenant is "Subject to the terms and conditions below, Owner rents to Tenant and Tenant rents from Owner, for residential purposes only, the premises known as Bedroom #__, located at..."
Further, the agreement to rent states, under the section of "Access for Inspection and Emergency", that the "Tenant agrees that Owner may enter the premises in the event of an emergency, or to make repairs or improvements, supply agreed services, or exhibit the premises to prospective purchasers or tenants. Except in the case of emergency, Owner shall give Tenant reasonable notice of intent to enter. In order to facilitate Owner's right to access, Tenant shall not without Owner's prior written consent, alter or re-key any locks to the premises. At all times Owner shall be provided with a key or keys capable of unlocking all such locks and gaining entry."
My landlord owns the home, and according to the agreement, I only rent the bedroom. The landlord does not live in the house, and there are two others that rent here as well (3 bedroom house). According to the tenant laws of CA, I do not fall under the "lodger" definition since the owner does not live in the house with me.
Herein lies the confusion. The landlord will enter the house without any notice multiple times a week to fix things, but then hang around for multiple hours after she is done. The agreement states that only the bedroom is rented, but my question is that since she does not live here, is this legal in California? I do not want to approach her without having firm evidence to the contrary.

