Well, with a 22349, and 15mph over, how much difference would it have made anyway? If I were to guess, I would say that the "80+" is an indication he paced you. had it been radar, he would have cited a more accurate number. Then again, it could have been radar and he opted to give you a break by citing you for the lowest speed bracket with the lowest fine (o to 15mph).
Well, knowing Geo McCalip's philosophy on the topic, (and unless its changed recently) he would only serve the D.A., get nothing, go to court with a motion to dismiss, knowing it would get him nowhere, argue that and get overruled, and instead receive copies of the docs he requested just prior to trial... Instead of serving the L.E.A. That is one likely reason why his website never seems to get any updates or changes... he used to change the color of the background for a bunch of different reason, I don't know if he still does... haven't been to that site in ages.
I actually never thought that any contribution I might make would involve or have any effect on that site. Never actually met the guy, but we did have a sort of a discussion through a third person., and let me just say that we simply agreed to disagree on several issues! So while I (obviously) wholeheartedly agree with you about which method is more beneficial, I think it would be best if we leave the edit where it is, and leave it up to each defendant to pick the method to use. Who knows, some people might prefer to have a choice than to have discovery.
You would be surprised that some people actually request discovery hoping it'll get ignored, so they can argue dismissal seriously believing it will actually work! Thread dated July 28, 2012: Do You Restart Discovery After Requesting a Trial De Novo

