My question involves civil rights in the State of: California, but currently in a Federal Court
So I received some discovery from the defense in my case (my case involves me Civil Rights being violated by police officers). The letter is an internal investigation by the County where I believed I was wrongfully arrested and detained. The letter was done by an outside contractor, but he was brought in and paid by them to do the investigation. The investigator, after reviewing all the facts, came to the same conclusion, that there was no basis behind arresting me, confirming my case. However, the investigation was stopped after he came to his conclusion.
My question is, is there some kind of duty of public interest that this investigation should have proceeded in order to prevent this from occurring in the future? My other discovery of interrogatories confirms that no further investigation took place with the officers on the scene, as they say it didn't. I am just looking for something that would reference the need for the County to proceed with the investigation when the findings clearly state that the officers were wrong. The officers were never even questioned and it is suspicious that they would bring someone in, pay them to do a partial investigation, and when they didn't like the answer, they ended it.

