I am not ignorant, I am a mother who wants to make her daughters life as stable as possible.
I do not want to interfere with my husband having a relationship with his daughter. I want what is in her best interest. You automatically think that is what I want to do, with out all the info..........
I do not feel that any child 27 months, I said 27 months old should get on a plane and fly 1200 miles away from her home to unfamilar places.
School age would seem more appropriate.
All you men on here reply as if some where at some time you were bruised.
If it was so natural for fathers like yourself to take care of their children, then there would not be laws having to tell you to do.
If you seem to know so much, my first question was simple and to the point.
Divorce in REM it totally does exist. A person who actually graduated from law school helped me out on that answer.
As far as the jurisdictional part of my other questions...all is done.
My husband lost jurisdiction on myself and my daughter because he lied on his paper work and I proved him to be a dishonest man, he trashed his character all on his own.
He said that he never left his domicle in KS to move to NJ...proved him a liar...he also never had me served a real brainer..........
so on so forth doesn't matter anymore.
Try to keep in mind that the only stupid question is the one not asked!!!
Have a good day boys.....keep your day jobs!

