I know you have answered some of my questions that I have, which are many. But one just came up and it again makes no sense to me.

My fiance was told regardless of him being innocent or guilty the parole officer was going to send him back to prison and you had more or less explained that it was "because they can." Come to find out, no one ever told my fiance that there would have to be a parole hearing before they actually sent him back. Instead they told him that if he signed this paper for this program, they would get him out of prison in about 3 months if he qualified. Why would they not tell him that he could have a hearing?

Also, we talked to the attorney and he is going to file the papers to withdraw this paper that was signed. The attorney also said that if he had a hearing, the other side would have to prove that a violation had occured and the attorney says that they do not have anything to go on, per the investiagor and himself. Is this true or is the attorney trying to get money? Is there a chance that they do have to prove this occured for him to be in violation like they say? Or is just "hearsay" enough?

Is sending him to a hearing going to take longer than just taking the program and getting out in approx. 3 months? As much as I would like him to prove his innocence, I would much rather have him home to be able to continue his life and to show people he is not the same person and he wants this this to be all over with.