Um, first things first. Why can't you keep your posts in a single thread? This would simplify matters. You didn't waive time, so the 45 day statutory speedy trial period in Pen C §1382 is still in play, correct? If so, when you objected to the continuance, did you ask for a dismissal under Pen C §1382?

According to People v. Wilson, if you didn't object and move to dismiss under 1382, then you've waived review of the error on appeal. That means that your only remedy, if you didn't move to dismiss under 1382, is through a Writ.

According to Pen C §1050, continuances can only be granted for good cause. There are specific procedural requirements in that section of law too. In particular, the moving party is required to file and serve the motion within at least 2 days prior to the trial date. If the moving party doesn't comply with the requirements, the court can impose sanctions but it cannot dismiss the case outright. It seems to be that you could file a writ asking the reviewing court to impose sanctions under PC §1050.5, and either dismiss your case or order it set for trial within the statutory 45 day period under PC §1382. You'll need to dig up the appropriate case law for exactly how this delay is prejudicial to you, though.