Ok but when the defendant says to his lawyer shouldn't we bring up the track continued and his lawyers response was we'll bring that up in trial. How would he have known that was going to be available to cross examine if the courts rulings for that hearing hadn't been known. Also what about if a witness had been called in for questioning and during his testimony was asked the same questions but his answers were different is that a credible witness? He was also identified by 2 of the witnesses at the beginning of the investigation as a possible suspect that committed the crime in question.

Im working on my little brothers PRP appeal. Not being real educated on the criminal procedure and what not I'm struggling to find the grounds I need in order for his appeal to go thru. If we had the funds to hire a lawyer we would but unfortunately we don't.