4.210 explicitly defines "due date" for some reason, assumed to not be gratuitous. The issue here is not that something was "exceeded", it's that if the verdict is guilty, the court admitted evidence once the case had been submitted.
No, that is a time limit (i.e., within x days). And the primary reason Benhoor said PC 1382 didn't apply is because TDN is not a "motion for a new trial", i.e. 1382 doesn't apply on its face to a TDN.
Sure, it may be another "out", but I'm also sure that there will be plenty of case law that details what exactly a court can order completely "off the record".
Well, if you were making this argument (i.e., officer's delayed TBD should not be accepted), it certainly helps if you can show prejudice somehow as required by 4.210(b)(8).
But we'll just have to see. It'll be an interesting case of threading the needle, assuming OP decides to go through with a writ...
------------
U.M's??? I think fate gave me my own (premature) senior moment there, perhaps for making fun of your reading glasses in that lidar-pacing-ETS thread!![]()

