@That Guy: I meant traffic school not traffic court. I pasted in the minutes and actions from the online case status.
@QQ:
This is a Riverside County case. I will try getting a copy of the declaration. I do indeed hope that it is file-stamped as the online minutes state, but who knows I assume that I can only get that when the vedict is handed down.
My reading and interpretation of 4.210 is the same as QQ I read People vs. Behoor, it relates to speedness of trial and whether that could invalidate the decision, not interpretation and compliance with TBD procedural process as set forth in the statue.
My contention is that the officer's declaration should be excluded since "...the clerk must submit the case on the due date..." Therefore my case is uncontested. Furthermore, I am/was not afford time to file a motion since the officer's declaration was filed and accepted on 1/5. even if I overnighted some thing on 1/6 it would arrive on 1/9. My trial is on 1/9 at 8:30am!
I'm ok with having no reason given, but I agree that it should be noted in the minutes. I see no entry, I pasted it in my initial posting. Otherwise, what's to prevent the court from extending the due date for the officer's submission up until or at the trial??? I'm not afforded the right to submitt declarations after the due date...
I agree with QQ. I don't want a TDN, I want to be able to appeal a guilty verdict on the basis of a violation of procedural process during the TBD (if infact the file stamp shows that it was a late submission)

