It seems that there will be both types of claims. The strongest type of statement that has been hinted to be included in the document is that the top boss failed to pay proper taxes after selling some assets. The top boss has the proper rights to be selling those assets but the middle boss claims to have evidence of such transaction and somehow also on the top boss's failure to pay taxes on it. The employee would not have a way to know either way. Yet the middle boss has also hinted to include in the document that the top boss has conspired against the interests of the main client and has withheld material information from the main client, who happens to be an elderly person who as placed trust in the top boss. Top boss, middle boss and employee are all ultimately working for the main client, who is a private person and not a company, and who is also increasingly dependent on everyone else due to advanced age and health condition. Middle boss is planning to have the employee to go along for anything that the middle boss would like to bring against the top boss although, to answer your question, the top boss is well resourced and very capable of self defense against wrongful accusations. Yet, the question here is about the employee's implications if is finally broken down into following middle boss's demands, regardless of merit.

