Does this stipulation for judgement look good. I was being sued for tradmark infrigment,dilution of trade name, tortious interference,injunctive relief and unfair business practices.Here is the stipulation without the names we will start on number 4.
Defendent herto stipulates he will not engage in any of the following activities
)a)use or display the name
(b)use or display the name or any reproduction or to describe the sevices
(c)otherwise dilute and distinctive quality and infringing plantif service mark
(d)cause likelyhood of injury to plaintif business
(e) cause likelyhood of confusion,deception or mistake as to the source or orgin of plaintif services
(f) claim any affilation with plaintiff
acouple more numbers that i do understand like to destroy business cards, flyiers
9, Stipulation is entered into between the parties as a settlement of real and valid claims by the plaintiff for actual damages and injury. The parties agree that specific enforcement of this aggrent is proper and necessary and that in any efforts to enforce thisagreement, all cost and fees shall be borne by any party found to be in breach of this agreement.
Does number 9 mean i do not owe them anything uless i break one of these rules? I think this is my best just to get out of this lawsuit. What do you guys think?

