I get the child support and accept that. Like I said, I'll pay what I am supposed to pay.

In regards to me creating the distance: She left me in our home in BLANK County and moved 265 miles across the state. Wouldn't she be responsible for creating the distance in the first place? I moved to Austin five months after she left me during our divorce proceedings. Austin is actually about 60 miles closer than where we lived together as we were married.

Now, that all said, where this clause comes into question is that I moved 30 miles east from where I was living in Austin to a place that was just outside and borders Travis county. The meeting location, where we met consistently while I lived in Austin, was not changed and in our decree she was required to meet me at the location. I took on the extra distance and never made an issue about having to drive 30 miles further. However, once I moved she decided to personally enforce the clause in the decree. The distance she had to drive to our meeting place never changed.

And my other question: Why would a court to allow a domicile on the non-custodial parent that involved there county of residence? Isn't that usually determined my miles? Shouldn't the domiclie be placed on the custodial parent so that a relationship with the non-custodial parent be supportive? After all, just as much as it is my responsibility to build that relationship, isn't it also the custodial parent to support that relationship?