I did learn, but like I said, I wasn't impaired. Impairment means not thinking straight, and in the 2 hours prior to my being stopped, I prevented a sexual assault, I talked my passenger out of committing assault, I separated her from another gentleman and I was able to talk since and maintain control over them. I also maintained control of my passenger during the entire traffic stop. Had I not, I believe she might have gone as far as to assault the officer placing her under arrest. I had full control and was completely in touch with reality. I was operating the vehicle safely, and I informed the officers of my medical conditions MULTIPLE times, which they chose to ignore. I had to demand my medication from the hospital during the blood draw, as the police simply did not care about my medical condition they asked about. I don't know if any of you know what a Pilodonal cyst is, but it DEFINITELY has an effect on your balance and endurance for physical movement, yes INCLUDING said sobriety tests. The only thing I don't have explained is the eyes, but having bloodshot watery eyes relates directly with exhaustion, no sleep, and fatigue. EVERYTHING comes into play. It has nothing to do with if the Judge believes it, just the Jury. You can't fight evidence and undeniable published proof. I'm just having trouble finding formal published proof. Having a BAC of .08 is the accepted level of legal intoxication, but can they prove my BAC at the exact time I was operating it was that high? No. Especially not if the Blood test comes back higher than .08. If it comes back lower, then that's a whole nothing thing to look into. some friends and lawyers i know swear to me that a blood test result of .07 will in fact be dismissed, or not even filed, though others tell me any DUI case the DA is handed in my county will definitely be filed with out a shred of doubt. So I have to plan on fighting this head on. One of my friends is giving me the reports he used to have his case dismissed. He blew a .09 and blood test was .12, he used a published report about breath testers having inaccuracies and a margin of error, calibration procedures, apparently the solution? can only be used twice, and if it was maintained by a certified technician for these machines. There is also a report he has about blood tests, about natural sugar alcohol, the reaction of the preservatives, temperature, etc etc, he did a budget battle as well, and he fought his public defender the whole way down, and the case was dismissed on the 3rd court date. His case was a LOT more open and shut than mine is, so its gotta be done, ill at least try. I am in the process of reading up on every aspect of the California laws, printing preparing and highlighting important passages from such law and case law, and I think the way it stands now, its 50/50. I'll know more when I get the blood test results. Do you have any other advice you may be able to offer me to help get this at LEAST dropped down to a wet and reckless? Thanks!