My question involves criminal law for the state of: Michigan.
At a suppresion hearing can an officer try to argue facts that he didnt say in his initial report. i have drug paraphernalia charges right now and my lawyer already in her motion has pretty much won the case, but says that officer and prosector will try to claim that the totalitary of the circumstances and the expierence of the officer would justify the stop. i was under the impression that if that stuff wasnt in the report than they cant use it in court. could someone please clarrify.

