Wheat v. Wheat[/I], 37 So. 3d 632 (Miss. 2010)]"Assets acquired or accumulated during the course of a marriage are subject to equitable division unless it can be shown by proof that such assets are attributable to one of the parties' separate estates prior to the marriage or outside the marriage."
Hemsley, 639 So.2d at 914. Given that James showed proof that his pension was fully funded prior to the marriage, and given that Judy's counsel, both in a letter to James's counsel and during oral arguments at the hearing, conceded that the pension was nonmarital property, the chancellor did not commit manifest error in reclassifying the pension as James's nonmarital property.