Quote Quoting JackA
View Post
Even the radar use doesn't matter if the officer testifies that the visual estimate of speed was any substantial amount over 55.
The officer must lay a proper foundation for his claim that he visually measured your speed. If not, it's not admissible. So he cannot just say "I visually measured the speed @ 63 MPH" ... object & get this stricken.

Looks like you were looking for an easy out & found that there isn't one in your case ; its fine to look

Now, you have a speeding case w/o an easy out. Go chk case law and see if the law requires the individual make of RADAR must be given judicial notice, not just the technology in general...