What sort of information would be grounds to rebutt said presumption?
In the sentencing guidelines in 2929.12 (I think, also .13) I fit all the items making a crime "less serious" and recidivism "less likely" and do not fit any of the items making recidivism more likely or the crime more serious. Does my standing as a dean's list student make any difference? Or the fact that upon searching my house, a large number of needles & used bags were found (no weapons were found), indicating heavy use (and likely selling to support habit) and am currently enrolled in a treatment program with multiple clean drug tests (both in treatment program & in reporting bond)? Does reporting recognizance make any indication as to the court's disposition towards me (I felt that receiving only 5000 recognizance, no cash or surety or appearance bond was very lucky, but partly due to my school status as my lawyer informed the judge as to my school standing, and after the prosecutor then specifically asked for bond due to the case being one of drug trafficking, the magistrate said "duly noted" and gave me recognizance).

