Results 1 to 10 of 10

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2

    Default Fatal Cardiac Arrhythmia Shortly After Discharge from Hospital

    My question involves medical malpractice in the state of: Minnesota
    Sitting here wondering if my family has a suit against the doctor/hospital that resulted in the death of my mother in law. First and foremost I believe the statute of limitations on a lawsuit for this matter is 3 years. Not 100% sure on this. \

    My mother in law was admitted to the hospital on a Monday mid morning. She had visited the doctor complaining of chest pains. (she is 53). The doctor at the clinic was concerned enough to have her transported by ambulance to the hospital for more testing. She was admitted.

    While in the hospital she under went a stress test, and was on a heart monitor the entire time she was there. My husband ( her son) and I went to the hospital to see her Monday night. While we were there her moniter alarmed 3 times or so. I being the worrier that I am started to question the nurse. The nurses response was vauge, but she didn't seem to be too upset. She just stated that she (my mother in law) was having some PVCs.

    She remained in the hospital for the main part of Tuesday to finish up the test and results from those tests.

    I called her Tuesday evening at about 7pm and asked her how things were going. She stated to me at that time the doctor had given her a "clean bill of health", and she was on here way home.

    Much to my surprise, my husband called me the next morning (Wednesday) having heard his Mom's address over his pager (he is a local volenteer fireman), saying there was a 50 some year old woman found unconcious. I at the time wasn't overly worried. After all she had just told me not even 12 hours earlier, that the doctor gave her a clean bill of health right? Much to my dismay however, my husband after leaving work and driving the 15 miles to his Mom's house found the police and ambulance there, only to find out that the had already called estimated time of death!!

    Are you serious???? How can she be released from the hospital, and dead not even 12 hours later????

    After autopsy:
    The Autopsy report reads:
    The most likely explanation of death is a fatal cardiac arrhythmia of unknown etilology. The myocarditis was focal and mild in the sections examined, but cannot be completely excluded as a contributing factor.

    Is this something her children should be looking into as a possible malpracitce issue??? Please help!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Behind a Desk
    Posts
    98,846

    Default Re: Fatal Cardiac Arrhythmia Shortly After Discharge from Hospital

    The administrator of the estate should have all of the relevant medical records reviewed by a malpractice firm. The answer to the question of whether there's a provable case of malpractice lies within the records, and without access we would only be able to make wild guesses.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2

    Default Re: Fatal Cardiac Arrhythmia Shortly After Discharge from Hospital

    Thanks for the response! I do agree with you that at this point it is all speculation. I have contacted a malpractice attorney, and they are going to let me know if they think it is a case worth looking into! Thanks again!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    38,867

    Default Re: Fatal Cardiac Arrhythmia Shortly After Discharge from Hospital

    just a note: pvc's are common and often symptoms of a benign cause. A very large percentage of the population experience pvc's or other arrhythmias on a regular basis. It itself, the presence of pvc's or some other arrhythmia and no treatment is not evidence of negligence.




    The entire ER history will have to be studied to determine if the symptoms and findings at the time indicated some other treatment be taken at the time. The fact that she was given a stress ECG while at the hospital would tend to indicate there were no findings of much of anything at the time. You don't have a person in cardiac distress perform a stress ecg. It is used as a tool to cause problems to surface that are not otherwise obvious.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    12

    Default Re: Fatal Cardiac Arrhythmia Shortly After Discharge from Hospital

    Sorry for your loss. If you still read replies: The problem in this case was likely electrical, whereas the stress test is usually meant to uncover problems that arise from inadequate blood flow in coronary arteries. Myocarditis (heart muscle infection) can cause "heart block", which can lead to cardiac arrest. Myocarditis is notably hard to diagnose, unfortunately with the surest means being an autopsy. Otherwise there would need to be enough scoring on the Dallas Criteria to warrant literally taking a snip of heart muscle for biopsy.

    "The myocarditis was focal and mild in the sections examined, but cannot be completely excluded as a contributing factor."

    Which means it was not widespread, besides being mild. That also means a biopsy might not have found it, except by chance if a snip was taken from an infected spot.

    Ironically, the exercise on the treadmill might overcome heart block and give a more normal picture on the EKG.

    As you can see, it is complex. One possible avenue: if the myocarditis (usually painless) was accompanied by pericarditis, which is known for chest pain. Yet you didn't mention pericarditis. Then you'd have to show that they should have been able to distinguish pericarditis from the angina that comes with blocked arteries - which is what they tested for.

    I hope you're seeing an atty that specializes in cardiac cases, else he won't know how to begin evaluating this and whether he should incur the expense of consulting med experts - especially with cause of death being so unsure.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    38,867

    Default Re: Fatal Cardiac Arrhythmia Shortly After Discharge from Hospital

    Quote Quoting medmal
    View Post
    Then you'd have to show that they should have been able to distinguish pericarditis from the angina that comes with blocked arteries - which is what they tested for.
    .
    where do you get that they tested for blocked arteries? It appears all that was performed was an ecg and a stress ecg. Neither of which tests for blocked arteries. Imaging tests are the only tests that will "test" for a blockage.

    Especially since the autopsy provided no evidence of occlusion of any veins/arteries of the heart that would have been considered as causation of death, their cause of death is "cardiac arrhythmia" which in itself, can be adequate to cause death. There was nothing, either in their tests nor in the autopsy, that would suggest there was any real concern of a blockage.

    and I can assure you that angina is not the only cause for pain, either in the chest in general or specific to the heart. Some types of arrhythmia itself can be the cause of considerable pain.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Medical Malpractice: Compllications Leading to Death Following Cardiac Surgery
    By BJPM in forum Malpractice Law
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-17-2011, 08:40 AM
  2. Medical Malpractice: Should I Have Been on Blood Thinners After Hospital Discharge
    By wanabegates in forum Malpractice Law
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-17-2010, 01:59 PM
  3. Medical Malpractice: Pain and Problems After Cardiac Stent
    By arthurrd in forum Malpractice Law
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-06-2009, 01:05 AM
  4. Cardiac Heart Doctors
    By tallfox in forum Worker's Compensation
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-08-2008, 05:01 PM
  5. Defective Vehicles and Parts: Fatal Aviation Accident
    By rockingdoublej in forum Accidents and Injuries
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-22-2005, 01:32 PM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources