So you won your TBD, you've watched 2 other cases where the Radar wasn't calibrated (or possibly the officer failed to present the calibration certificate, who knows)... For your case in particular, have you had a chance to read the officer's declaration? And if so, what specifically, did the officer fail to provide/prove that resulted in you being found not guilty?

At any rate, your "theory" has been tried, tested and it failed... You can read People v. Sullivan, 234 Cal. App. 3d 56, and I quote:

While section 40801, setting forth the general prohibition against speed traps, may be viewed as a substantive rule of law, section 40803, subdivision (a), can only be characterized as a rule of evidence. The Legislature could have selected other remedies or penalties for violation of section 40801, but it clearly opted for the exclusion of evidence.


If in fact, your case was dismissed based on the officer having maintained a speed trap, then, and as prescribed in VC 40800-40808, the evidence he presented was excluded and your case was subsequently dismissed as prescribed by law. As such, you have no case!