My question involves a speeding ticket from the State of: WA
Lake Forest Park has installed School Speed Zone Cameras. Ordinace 977 (10.06.040) states the camera speed infractions are "processed in the same manner as parking infractions".
Washington Court rule IRLJ 2.2 (c) Service of Notice states, in short, the notice of infraction is served by 1. the citing officer at time of issuance, 2. the citing officer affixes to vehicle or 3. the citing officer files with court... and the court has the notice served in person or by mail.
Lake Forest Park has an officer review the infraction, the officer notifies the camera vendor American Traffic Solutions (ATS) in Arizona... ultimately with ATS mailing out the notice of infraction to the apparent violator.
Since neither 1, 2 or 3 above are being met, would it be appropriate to move for dismissal since the notice of infraction was not properly served?

