Thanks. What I meant is that I HAVE morals (albeit slightly different than yours) and that in general I am not a violent person or bad guy, but I can get violent when I have to, and even so I have a level of self control
(of anger/violence) that you have rarely seen in a person. And when I get violent I always make sure I am right. The mathematical model of "right" if you may, might be applied differently between me and you.
As far as what makes me a bad guy that is purely opinion and perception. That is a whole 'nother philosophical discussion. Plus I said "that bad" because there's no denying that I'm a bad guy. Like I said what seems like antisocial behavior in one culture, may not be, and may even be pro-social in another culture.
Just curious, why don't I get to judge my victim? Is it because I know him? I can't judge someone based on their morals either? Why? Because I preyed on a predator?
Because the prey refused to be a prey? I didn't understand that part.
What sounded like justification (and can be seen as that) was actually a defensive shield in order to subtly hint readers to spare me their moral opinions or quetching (which I don't care about) resulting from feeling morally superior, which usually happens with judgmental persons. I should of just said that from the go, because I obviously failed at that and probably even provoked that.
Yes there were children in the top bedroom which we didn't see until they came out with grandma. No one was harmed, except maybe psychologically.
When you opined that I might have a chance you mean if I was to ask the Supreme Court to take me off the registry? I really appreciate your feedback cyjeff, I was surprised to get a reply so expeditiously.

