My question involves traffic court in the State of: California - San Diego.
This is a bit on-going however I thought I should start a new thread.
I called the court today to ask whom the prosecutor will be for this case, and also an address to send my discovery request to. Their response was "there is no prosecutor, only you the judge and the subpoenaed officer."
From reading a lot of posts on here, should I cite:
People v. Marcroft (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1 , 8 Cal.Rptr.2d 544
and (please help with the correct verbage) motion for dismissal due to lack of prosecution?
----
This is my thinking. Can the officer not testify if no one calls him to the stand? Also if the judge calls him to the stand, doesn't he then assume the job of prosecutor and from that wouldn't he automatically be biased by assuming that role?
Thanks!

