Okay. Thank you for clarifying that
At 70 miles away, I'm not sure ROFR is even feasible, let alone reasonable.
But truly, that court order is terrifically ambiguous and I can see both parents being able to argue their point.
Mom's point: It doesn't say that Mom MUST hand over kiddo to Dad if she's going to be gone a few hours, therefore if she leaves kiddo with you (or anyone else) for a couple of hours she shouldn't be penalized.
Dad's point: It DOES say that a) the child will be cared for by Mom (ie, not a third party, not daycare etc) when the child isn't with Dad and b) both parents must consider the other first before making other arrangements - so Dad should be able to take kiddo when Mom is working.
Quick question though.
Who created the distance?

