My question involves unemployment benefits for the state of: California
Writing pnts & authorities supporting writ of mand. – the ALJ states that by me not disclosing that I was on probation makes me deceitful and not dealing fairly with my employer – testimony by employer is the DID NOT inquire (not asked on app) and still would have hired me. Does this show bias/abuse of discretion, since I was under no legal or moral obligation to disclose? There are several other statements where he contradicts testimony to characterize me negatively
The ALJ also makes statements in his findings that are not supported by the testimony such as " the employee also acted unprofessionally - he cursed at a female office worker on at least 1 occasion, where the testimony actually states "there was one instance where the gentleman next to wayne or maybe wayne i dont know who - said something to our secratry and wayne called me and said im not taking that fom that ****ing bitch. he doesnt testify to knowing "who" made the call or "what was said . this doesnt collaberate the ALJ's finding. how do i address this? One more thing, the ALJ also makes statements in his findings that there is no testimony to support - advice?