Results 1 to 3 of 3

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    18

    Default May I Use Excerpts from "Statements for the Record" from a Government Website

    Hello,
    I'm not sure where I should post this question.

    There was a hearing of the House Ways & Means Committee in which hundreds of American citizens, including myself, wrote letters to the Committee regarding our opinions of the nature of the hearing and our personal struggles re: unemployment.

    The letters we sent have become "Statements for the Record." They have been posted on the House Ways & Means Committee website for that particular hearing, and are available for viewing by anyone.

    May I use excerpts of the letters without the consent of those who wrote them? If so, must I include names or not?

    I wish to use some of the statements of others in correspondence to Congress, and to major media sources. I would like to use the names of the people from whose letters I use, but if I can't do that, coould I use first name and just the initial of the last name?

    Am I allowed to do this without their permission, since the statements are on public record, or would this be some kind of infringement upon people's rights?
    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Key West, FL
    Posts
    2,350

    Default Re: May I Use Excerpts from "Statements for the Record" from a Government Website

    No, it is public record and public information.

    They have absolutely no expectation of privacy.

    If you are not using their full name, they then have no standing whatsoever to object.

    You do not need anyone's permission.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Behind a Desk
    Posts
    98,846

    Default Re: May I Use Excerpts from "Statements for the Record" from a Government Website

    The identity of the person and their association with their statements is a matter of public record. Even if we were to assume that the individuals held copyright to their letters, the government claims no copyright and using excerpts for the purpose of advancing the debate would appear to fall under "fair use". The authors have voluntarily associated their names with their letters as part of the public record; if you wanted to abbreviate their names as a courtesy you could of course do that, but they don't realistically have any expectation of privacy in their names being associated with their statements.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Trademarks: Is My "the Joy of the Joy of -" Website Violating "the Joy of" Trademark
    By KayZahn in forum Intellectual Property
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-25-2010, 07:13 PM
  2. Other Offenses: Photographs of Classified Government "Stealth Craft"
    By big john thomson in forum Criminal Charges
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-28-2009, 11:45 AM
  3. Business Issues: Can "Blogger" Referral Website Violate Copyright Law
    By wchenry in forum Business Law
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-10-2009, 08:53 PM
  4. Unemployment Benefits: Got Laid Off from Real Job, but Still Have "Income-Generating" Website
    By crowned in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-11-2009, 03:04 PM
  5. Trademarks: Created an "Anti" Website
    By TopSecret in forum Intellectual Property
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-19-2007, 04:14 AM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources