
Quoting
Bellomo v Gagliano, 815 So. 2d 721 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 5th Dist. 2002), emphasis added
In G.F.C. v. S.G., 686 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), this court held, in circumstances such as in this case, that where a child is born to an intact marriage and is recognized by the husband and wife as their child, the husband is deemed the legal father to the exclusion of all others and a man claiming to be the child's biological father has no common law, statutory or constitutional right to sue for paternity. The court expressly held that section 742.011 does not extend to permit the alleged biological father of a child born of an intact marriage to sue for a determination of paternity. See also Johnson v. Ruby, 771 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (prevailing law in Florida is that putative father has no right to seek to establish paternity of child born into intact marriage when mother and her husband object); S.B. v. D.H., 736 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (putative biological father cannot maintain paternity action conceived by married woman when both woman and her husband object); I.A. v. H.H., 710 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (biological father has no right to bring action for paternity of child of intact family or where child born before marriage was acknowledged by husband).