I was not the person given a citation. At one time (in the late "80s" ) I was a civilian police supervisor on the same installation that we speak about here. I served as a liason between the Department and the 133 US Court. I left law enforcement and took another job with the DOD on the same installation. Upon 9/11 the civilian police officers were replaced with Air National Guard Security Forces.
My entrance into this whole mess was the result of a citation given to a friend. He wished to fight the citation. I knew that the military replacement for civilian LE officers had not bothered to follow any of the law enforcement standards. They did not certify their equipment nor train their personnel.
I tried to advise the LE organization that they were in vioation of both Michigan, Military , and USC. In short I became a Federal/State of Michigan whistleblower when my employer started to take action against me. I spoke with two US Attorney's on the day of the Magistrate hearing. They were very skeptical and were going to reschedule the hearing anyway as the LE representative was not present. The plea bargain was offered to my friend who took it rather than appear in court again, drive the 40 miles again, and take more vacation days off work. The sweetheart deal included a vastly lowered fine and no points on his license. The citation was for 7 miles over the limit.
The 127th Wing Security Forces were writing up to 300 tickets a year and continued to do so even after the initial complaint.
A FOIA request provided documentation to support the complaint. It could only obtain the last six years records. More troubling was the idea that people had be prosecuted for others offences as a result to these "legal stops" based upon paced speed violations. Some cases were federal or state or US Military adjucation.
For some doubters, I am willing to email or Post the FOIA doucments that support my story.
But my question is---- what should have been proper porcedure by the court or the US Attorney?

I incorrectly mentioned 31 USC and it should have be 31 CFR.