We know what the OP has told us what he said -- and he has yet to indicate that he made any actual allegation of sexual harassment. Imagining that the discussion was about sexual harassment may be a fun game, but two things we know where front and center in that discuss is the OP's misconduct that triggered the review of his employment, and his inappropriate conduct with other employees. Even if we run with the pretense that a complaint was made, the review of the OP's misconduct started before it was made and, despite his being something of chronic complainer about workplace issues, came up for the first time only after his employment was on the line. And all of this for a matter involving a young teenage boy who can't deal with his co-workers wearing yoga pants because he gets too aroused to work, and thinks every inadvertent contact with a woman means that she is hitting on him.
If you know of an employment lawyer who would try to take this to a jury on these facts, you know a fool who likes to be separated from his money.

