I also agree, but, it also depends on whether or not the restrained party has taken up residence elsewhere. If this order was dropped at the initial court date (say, two or three weeks after it was issued) I'd say it's more likely that he could claim residency still. But, if this order was dropped after a few years, I'd think that residency would clearly be an issue and thus his entry might well be governed under landlord or other law rather than the rights of a resident. We deal with this out here a lot and a lot will depend on the length of the order and whether the restrained party has actually established himself elsewhere on a permanent basis. If he has - or arguably so - we will often tend to enforce the occupant's prohibition against entry and if the formerly restrained party forces entry and she is willing to sign a citizen's arrest, he will generally go to jail.

But, it all depends on the totality of the circumstances.