Quote Quoting cdwjava
View Post
Okay ... if the TRO said NO CONTACT with the wife or child, and he contacted said wife or child, then he was in violation of the TRO - even if it was a song and a happy birthday message. If the TRO was a DV TRO then it was a violation of PC 372.6. If merely a custody and visitation order through Family Court, it is likely PC 166(a).
Did you read that whole Husband had an order in his county that allowed for peaceful contact at the same time as wifes that did not allow contact. I.E Conflicting orders. For the boards info, we are aware of People V. Gonzales, and People V Gooch, in Re HEather, and People V. Lee, what we are trying to find is a case, where conflicting orders are in two different counties, which one prevails? BTW though songs are protected speech... and I should add the Birthday card was not dated, it was also in technically his car as well.