Quote Quoting J. Alfred Braun
View Post
I do not see an Answer to the basic question posed by the OP

Quote : " How to Contest a Red Light Camera Violation Ticket "

Short answer ...

the Remedy lies in the 6th Amendment

CONFRONTATION

''The primary object of the constitutional provision in question was to prevent depositions of ex parte affidavits . . . being used against the prisoner in lieu of a personal examination and cross- examination of the witness in which the accused has an opportunity not only of testing the recollection and sifting the conscience of the witness, but of compelling him to stand face to face with the jury in order that they may look at him, and judge by his demeanor upon the stand and the manner in which he gives his testimony whether he is worthy of belief'' 145 The right of confrontation is ''[o]ne of the fundamental guarantees of life and liberty . . . long deemed so essential for the due protection of life and liberty that it is guarded against legislative and judicial action by provisions in the Constitution of the United States and in the constitutions of most if not of all the States composing the Union.'' 146 Before 1965, when the Court held the right to be protected against state abridgment, 147 it had little need to clarify the relationship between the right of confrontation and the hearsay rule, 148 inasmuch as its supervisory powers over the inferior federal courts permitted it to control the admission of hearsay on this basis. 149 Thus, on the basis of the Confrontation Clause, it had concluded that evidence given at a preliminary hearing could not be used at the trial if the absence of the witness was attributable to the negligence of the prosecution, 150 but that if a witness' absence had been procured by the defendant, testimony given at a previous trial on a different indictment could be used at the subsequent trial. 151 It had also recognized the admissibility of dying declarations 152 and of testimony given at a former trial by a witness since deceased. 153 The prosecution was not permitted to use a judgment of conviction against other defendants on charges of theft in order to prove that the property found in the possession of defendant now on trial was stolen.

in other words---

the "Ticket " is uncorroborated , un Verified ....Hearsay

and is not admissible in a real Court
Sadly, you're confusing the "ticket" which gets "filed" in court with "evidence" which is "admitted" with the court.
The "ticket" is not "evidence" so how can it be "hearsay"?
The ticket is merely the charging document... The evidence, well that comes later!

But what you've posted here makes little sense and obviously, falls short of answering anything remotely close to "how to Contest a Red Light Camera Violation Ticket?"

Little details but until you get them right, you're bound to get yourself -or anyone who follows your advice- into deeper trouble!