YUP.....that's what I thought too. A boilerplate copy of a copy. The line about the prehearing trial was the clue I took.
IRLJ 3.1b discusses the defenses ability to request discovery and the timelines the prosecution must meet or else. Also, what the prosecution has to provide. The line "No other discovery shall be required." reflects the courts won't or shouldn't require me to provide the prosecutor discovery unless I choose to. True?
Barry, I think this is sound advice.
Good point....close the door on that path. I do have witnesses, but I'm not going to get them involved. I'm confident I can win this without them. If I did list them to the response, is there a chance the prosecutor could subpoena them to court? I don't want that.
That's a good idea about the copy of the IRLJ. Amazing isn't it?
This is my first ticket I've fought. I plan to fight any others I get from this point forward.
One last question, if the defendant wins, is there any recourse for reimbursement of costs incurred to defend? It would be nice to put a little salt in their wound.
Your wisdom is much appreciated.
Koy

