Quote Quoting danielpalos
View Post
I am of the opinion that employers should not be able to permanently ban anyone, hired via at-will employment doctrine, ceteris paribus.

As a check and balance of rights between the employer and employee; I think the employer should only have recourse to banning someone from employment, from that specific company, for a specified length of time.

The caveat (for the employer) should be that of stating a specific length of time; and by implication the specific length of employment.

As an example, a two year ban on employment with that employer (should the employment not work out) should require (the equivalent of) a two year employment obligation; if, and only if, they want recourse to a two year ban on any specific individual.
So, say an employee embezzles money from the company. Are you saying that after a specified time, that everything should be forgiven and forgotten?

Come on. So, a friend of yours beats up your wife. After 2 years, you are willing to invite him back into your home for a family dinner?

What a maroon.