Quote Quoting Harold99
View Post
It is a good lawyer's job to imply something without actually saying it. Would you agree? Like what you just did when you said "the difference is not minor." Instead of telling me what something is not, why didn't you say what it is? Like, is it moderate or major? Who knows what you said because you didn't say anything, which leads the reader to assume what you meant, and, it leaves the door wide open for you to deny what was implied by saying "not minor."

To say what something is not, like "not minor" is actually taking no stance on what it is while implying it is major. I guess you would have to experience a lawyer playing with the English language to rip you off for a large sum of money before you became aware of the art a lot of lawyers are highly skilled at. An yes, TM has some of those skills.
Implying is not the same as misrepresenting what someone says. A good attorney's job is to craft an argument supported by the evidence available, not to misrepresent facts (can be discredited in cross) and certainly not to lie.

There is a spectrum between minor and major. They are not binary states.

I grew up with attorneys and my brother was exceptional at discrediting a poorly constructed argument when we were kids and he was a heavy hitter on his debate team and still is since becoming an Ivy League PhD. I have availed myself of the services of attorneys a time or two.

Again, your bias and poor reading/comprehension are causing no end of problems and you just can't accept that these issues exist while rampaging through a thread and making it about you and your dislike of attorneys for numerous pages.