Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 99

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    4,301

    Default Re: Law is Not Determinative

    Quote Quoting determinatio
    View Post
    It does not matter whether or not you are attorneys, you, nonetheless, deem law an efficacy. You totally dismiss my propositions as ''philosophy", and, since you deem what I am doing philosophy, find it inacceptable upon this forum, while, all the while, I am simply doing critical thinking. I have never ever employed filthy anal insults as most, including yourself, have done. You make me angry via your brutal misconduct and,then wine when I return your own medicine, you cannot handle it. You are the most stupidly brutal of the lot, and, in response, I have,unhappily, become totally brutal and savage myself, however, I started out in peace with the benign purpose of raising the consciousness of persons who blindly mistakenly believe language of law is determinative among humans.

    Simply quit accosting me and, that will be it, it will be ended; nonetheless, members keep on and on...
    There is no one here that can't handle as you try to return our own medicine. Nobody here is buying you line o' crap or spending the time you think is sufficient to counter it. This is making you angry but instead of leaving the forum to troll elsewhere, you whine about those here being bullies.

    What I really think bothers you is the fact that your theory can be countered with so few words that it casts a light on the fact that your theory is simply BS to begin with.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Law is Not Determinative

    Quote Quoting PayrolGuy
    View Post
    There is no one here that can't handle as you try to return our own medicine. Nobody here is buying you line o' crap or spending the time you think is sufficient to counter it. This is making you angry but instead of leaving the forum to troll elsewhere, you whine about those here being bullies.

    What I really think bothers you is the fact that your theory can be countered with so few words that it casts a light on the fact that your theory is simply BS to begin with.
    So, then, sensibly counter with your few words.

    The attempt to engage in rational polemic among what turns out to be ignorant dummies,is always labelled as trolling by the dummies, who cannot possibly do rational debate.

    I keep challenging you to rationally counter the original OP entitled Law is Ontologically Unintelligible, however, you do not and cannot, though I wish you would try; I will be kind and consider your attempt with compassionate response. All you ever do is assert this and assert that, without reasoned explanation.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    4,301

    Default Re: Law is Not Determinative

    Quote Quoting determinatio
    View Post
    So, then, sensibly counter with your few words.

    The attempt to engage in rational polemic among what turns out to be ignorant dummies,is always labelled as trolling by the dummies, who cannot possibly do rational debate.

    I keep challenging you to rationally counter the original OP entitled Law is Ontologically Unintelligible, however, you do not and cannot, though I wish you would try; I will be kind and consider your attempt with compassionate response. All you ever do is assert this and assert that, without reasoned explanation.
    I did and you didn't reply. Go back to post #20.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    47.606 N 122.332 W in body, still at 90 S in my mind.
    Posts
    1,678

    Default Re: Law is Not Determinative

    I'm the most stupidly brutal of the lot? Thanks! I'm touched! And you're the most asinine, thin-skinned, arrogant, sanctimonious, pedantic pseudo-intellectual it's been my misfortune to quarrel with on this board.

    So, go soak your head and get a grip. You are not the smartest person in the room, you don't lend yourself to rational debate and you continue to prate the same nonsense over and over again.

    Before you go on about your treatment at my hands bear in mind that you claimed I'm the most stupidly brutal of the lot so I'll require you to use simple small words. I can't comprehend beyond 2 or three syllables.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Law is Not Determinative

    Quote Quoting Mark47n
    View Post
    I'm the most stupidly brutal of the lot? Thanks! I'm touched! And you're the most asinine, thin-skinned, arrogant, sanctimonious, pedantic pseudo-intellectual it's been my misfortune to quarrel with on this board.

    So, go soak your head and get a grip. You are not the smartest person in the room, you don't lend yourself to rational debate and you continue to prate the same nonsense over and over again.

    Before you go on about your treatment at my hands bear in mind that you claimed I'm the most stupidly brutal of the lot so I'll require you to use simple small words. I can't comprehend beyond 2 or three syllables.
    Fine. Worm-out and do not hold you word that you can dismiss my propositions via a few words. That's it. I hope to never interact with you ever again; I am sick of your inveterately pure ignorance and, stupidity.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Law is Not Determinative

    It appears as though I may have given you bad advice. From a rather cursory glance, it seems like the users in other forums find you insufferable as well. It is certainly a relief to know that Expert Law is but one of many forums that displease you.



    Forum: The Legal Junkies Forum

    Highlights:

    "So, what's your point, other than the self-aggrandizement you get from tossing out equally unintelligible nonsense?"

    Unfortunately, you've deemed this "site, populated by attorneys, is radically dishonest and ethically bankrupt, for, the team has erased ninety percent of my OP. Can't handle honorable critique of the construct ''law''!"

    I guess The Legal Junkies Forum wasn't receptive to you. Let's move on.

    -----------------------------
    Forum:City Data Forum

    Highlights:

    "Thats is incoherent psychobabble with philosophical pretentions."

    "I'm thinking if I can survive that rhetoric, this virus will be a breeze! Holy cow , that OP was ten minutes of my time I'd like back. Lawfully I'm deserving of a refund"

    "Hey Duane I expect you'll be moving on to yet another forum after this thread?"

    "I was wondering how long it'd be before you resort to homophobic insults that were your calling card on the other forums. Let me guess, everyone else who dismisses your ramblings, is a "bunch of little girls on the rag"?

    -----------------------------

    Forum:The US Message Board

    Highlights:

    "This must be why they blackballed people in the Roman Forum for reductio ad absurdum"

    Then you yourself explain:

    "The county I live in has a mandatory trash collection ordinance, wherein they want to take your home and property for failure to pay the mandatory fee; it is purely a peonage system and ilk of slavery prohibited under the fourteenth amendment. I have been going round and round with the county attorney for many years and have prepared a fifty page affirmative defense, whereby I believe I can beat them via their own instruments, however, to put the finishing touch on the defense by positing a theoretical overthrow to their so-called justice system, would be an interesting gamble..."

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    4,301

    Default Re: Law is Not Determinative

    Quote Quoting darwinrules
    View Post
    It appears as though I may have given you bad advice. From a rather cursory glance, it seems like the users in other forums find you insufferable as well. It is certainly a relief to know that Expert Law is but one of many forums that displease you.



    Forum: The Legal Junkies Forum

    Highlights:

    "So, what's your point, other than the self-aggrandizement you get from tossing out equally unintelligible nonsense?"

    Unfortunately, you've deemed this "site, populated by attorneys, is radically dishonest and ethically bankrupt, for, the team has erased ninety percent of my OP. Can't handle honorable critique of the construct ''law''!"

    I guess The Legal Junkies Forum wasn't receptive to you. Let's move on.

    -----------------------------
    Forum:City Data Forum

    Highlights:

    "Thats is incoherent psychobabble with philosophical pretentions."

    "I'm thinking if I can survive that rhetoric, this virus will be a breeze! Holy cow , that OP was ten minutes of my time I'd like back. Lawfully I'm deserving of a refund"

    "Hey Duane I expect you'll be moving on to yet another forum after this thread?"

    "I was wondering how long it'd be before you resort to homophobic insults that were your calling card on the other forums. Let me guess, everyone else who dismisses your ramblings, is a "bunch of little girls on the rag"?

    -----------------------------

    Forum:The US Message Board

    Highlights:

    "This must be why they blackballed people in the Roman Forum for reductio ad absurdum"

    Then you yourself explain:

    "The county I live in has a mandatory trash collection ordinance, wherein they want to take your home and property for failure to pay the mandatory fee; it is purely a peonage system and ilk of slavery prohibited under the fourteenth amendment. I have been going round and round with the county attorney for many years and have prepared a fifty page affirmative defense, whereby I believe I can beat them via their own instruments, however, to put the finishing touch on the defense by positing a theoretical overthrow to their so-called justice system, would be an interesting gamble..."
    I couldn't find that US Messages post when I went looking for it after our buddy here denied that all of this was over a trash bill of some sort. Good work.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Law is Not Determinative

    Quote Quoting PayrolGuy
    View Post
    I did and you didn't reply. Go back to post #20.
    Your assertion had simply struck me as so profoundly mistaken, i.e., that since the police have guns, that language of law is a determinative agency among men, that I completely disregarded the absurd statement, when, precisely at that the time, another member, TaxingMatters, had just posted that he agreed that the language of law itself has no efficacy, and, I just assumed you would see TaxingMatters' post disagreed with yours and was agreed with my position. Also, it struck me very heavily that you had completely failed to understand the point that there is distinction between the language of the law, and, the violence of punishment, which violence is the only thing law pitifully has going for itself, which violence is precisely what law is acting against being done by persons, with law-violence, which doing violence to punish violence is self-inconsistent and barbaric.

    darwinrules;
    You have merely collected the retarded declarations of other dimwits alike persons on this site, too stupid to follow the OP, so they only issue brutal insult instead.

    To be balanced and fair, publish the uplifting, encouraging and agreed comments from the US Message Board, and, you are taking some to these out of context.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    47.606 N 122.332 W in body, still at 90 S in my mind.
    Posts
    1,678

    Default Re: Law is Not Determinative

    Quote Quoting determinatio
    View Post
    Your assertion had simply struck me as so profoundly mistaken, i.e., that since the police have guns, that language of law is a determinative agency among men, that I completely disregarded the absurd statement, when, precisely at that the time, another member, TaxingMatters, had just posted that he agreed that the language of law itself has no efficacy, and, I just assumed you would see TaxingMatters' post disagreed with yours and was agreed with my position. Also, it struck me very heavily that you had completely failed to understand the point that there is distinction between the language of the law, and, the violence of punishment, which violence is the only thing law pitifully has going for itself, which violence is precisely what law is acting against being done by persons, with law-violence, which doing violence to punish violence is self-inconsistent and barbaric.

    darwinrules;
    You have merely collected the retarded declarations of other dimwits alike persons on this site, too stupid to follow the OP, so they only issue brutal insult instead.

    To be balanced and fair, publish the uplifting, encouraging and agreed comments from the US Message Board, and, you are taking some to these out of context.
    Pay your trash bill.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Law is Not Determinative

    Quote Quoting Mark47n
    View Post
    Pay your trash bill.
    I have been paying for the reason I just gave. There was a land survey done recently. Turns out the next door neighbor has been knowingly keeping his dumpster on my property fordecades upon decades; and, the Ordinance, 830.02, states that every residence shall pay a sanitation fee for said residence. So, that neighbor has, actually, been paying for sanitation collection from my property, not his;--hence, the neighbors are actually violating the ordinance, because they are not paying for collection off of their residence. I am, putatively, per the County Attorney, $350 in arrears, however, that $350 was paid by the neighbor.

    I am thinking about making an appointment to speak to the County Attorney, and, to pose a hypothetical question in order to illustrate the situation: "Lets say you and I are neighbors, and, you are keeping your dumpster on my land, knowingly, when 830.02 mandates every residence pay for collection from that residence, whose sanitation fee are you actually paying, mine or yours?"

    Quote Quoting Mark47n
    View Post
    Then submit your affirmative defense and shut up about it.

    If you think you have the tools to tear the system down then do it, you have my support! Of course, if you tear down the system then what keeps the wolves at bay? Then there are no consequences for the brutal savages like myself when we come for you and you simply don't have enough bullets or arms.

    Look, you sound like some old guy who clearly has an ax to grind and instead of putting your money where your mouth is you come here and play your little games. As for me, you're just a simple diversion from staring at drawings, schematics and reading manuals.

    Thanks for the entertainment!
    I am to be 75 in June, and, have used only a road bike for transportation since 1970; I can ride all day and am undoubtedly in far far better condition that a biker! I am a slim and muscular #175, and, I would probably kick you ass, no matter how big you may be, I am a martial artist as well. Get bent fool.

    The system is not going to simply be instantly torn down, history moves in a dialectical fashion, i.e., thesis, antithesis, syntheses; and, that is what I am attempting here. I set forth a thesis, you an antithesis, and a synthesis is compromised.

    I have prepared a defense, but do not want to spend a ton of money to implement it. I did, in writing, challenge the County Attorney to take me to court, she copped-out by saying I did not owe near enough money, after sending me letters threatening to take everything I own in this world. I have prevailed against attorneys in court in the past; these things are known, she does not want to tangle with an unknown quantity like me, believe me. Simply because when an attorney loses to a non-attorney, that career is done for.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources