I understand what he was saying, and I said in Ohio, if the DF wishes a jury trial he gets it. If the DF chooses a Bench trial and the state wishes a jury trial, the state has no say in it, the DF gets his bench trial, unless I am reading rule 23 incorrectly.
http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/Leg...lProcedure.pdf
I quite understand what you are saying. All I said was, the phrase Legally unavilable, as a completed idea was not in the case cited.
I said I understood the points Jack posted. I also read the case Ron posted, and I understand what was meant to be stated as a legal conclusion to the reader. I understand the point you are making about the hearing and your husband, I'm not disagreeing.
But I'll drop it whether or not you think I am not getting it! I do wish the best for all concerned, I never meant my post to indicate otherwise.

