Quote Quoting Court Jester
View Post
Ok, well that's only small snippet. the question is to Appeal or Not Appeal.

I feel that the issue of Abuse of Discretion, bias and prejudiced along with Violating Due Process because I have not been notified properly may be in play.

I've got 9 more days to file.. Any thoughts?
I can offer some thoughts, but have no experience with appeals and cannot assess your chances. If you haven’t already, you would definitely want to read the entire Washington State Rules for Appeal of Decisions of Courts of Limited Jurisdiction. I know it will involve some expense including the filing fee and cost to order a transcript. Also it will cost you time to write and research. The whole process would best be viewed as an adventure and learning experience, and if you choose to proceed I would encourage you to share on this forum regardless of outcome.

The missing subsection argument has been successful in some courts, although I’m inclined to think not as much in recent years. The current SECTOR electronic ticketing system probably doesn’t even allow a subsection to be entered (every speeding ticket I’ve seen lately lacks a subsection). For a recent example of this argument not succeeding, you might want to read this previous post from a thread last December.

However the poster in the above linked thread did win based on the officer not stating personal knowledge of device testing. That’s where I think you might have shot yourself in the foot by subpoenaing the officer, because your strongest defense probably had to do with him not checking the moving radar patrol speed against his speedometer.

Based on what you described about how the judged behaved on that issue, I’m guessing the officer’s sworn written statement lacked that required evidence. In the officer’s absence, his written statement is the only evidence available and if insufficient (not containing all required elements) the judge would have been forced to dismiss. Instead the judge was able to coax that necessary element from the officer, and also I’m pretty sure judges in general are more reluctant to dismiss whenever the officer is present.

Also based on your description, it would appear that you never served a discovery request on the prosecutor, and probably based your defense only on the notice of infraction and cross examination of the officer. Your entire defense should have been based on the written statement.

Anyway you did object to the officer’s apparent failure to conduct a patrol speed/speedometer check, and I’m inclined to believe denial of that objection could quite possibly be your best chance for winning an appeal. A more correct initial motion should have been to exclude or suppress the evidence of speed, followed by a motion to dismiss due to lack of evidence--but I’m not sure that technicality would hurt you much since what’s most important is that you objected. Probably in an appeal argument you would want to try to illustrate how the judge was leading the witness prior to denying your objection.