It is true that I only know of the location due to what the officer wrote on the ticket. I was driving home to the Sacramento area from Bishop that day. I'd been on 395 for a while, and there are few landmarks that I would have taken note of while driving. All I can be certain of is that I was at least an hour or more out of Bishop. And I am absolutely certain that, wherever it happened, there were 4 lanes of traffic, two each way, separated by a wide median strip, and the officer was parked in the median strip, perpendicular to traffic, while he made his observation. I clearly recall seeing him, parked on my left, facing more or less east (tail to the S/B lanes, toward the N/B lanes), perpendicular to traffic, as I went past him, and he turned on his lights and pulled out a minute or two after I passed. It seems clear to me that I did not commit the violation I was cited for.

Checking out the area in question, I agree that Google Maps seems to show this stretch as being only 2 lanes. As I mentioned before, I had been driving from Bishop that day (2nd day of a trip from southern Utah), and 395 has few landmarks that I would've taken note of while driving. I only have the info from the ticket to indicate where the stop took place. But I am positive that, wherever it was, 395 at that point was a divided 4-lane highway. The officer was parked in the wide median, on a sort of dirt lane that crossed the median, perpendicular to the lanes of traffic, and he was facing the N/B lanes. I saw him parked there as soon as I crested the hill, his car in the median to my left, and saw him turn on his lights and pull out in my rear-view mirror. I am sure the officer knows that he was parked in the median strip, using his radar gun. As to the question (from someone else) about what I hope to accomplish by fighting this, the answer should be obvious -- I am trying to avoid having to pay over $350, as well as the conviction.